Affordable Contracting, Inc. v. Santarsiere

693 So. 2d 1123, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5597, 1997 WL 269171
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1997·No. No. 97-600·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affordable Contracting, Inc., and James Ford, [collectively “defendants”] appeal an order denying their motion to vacate the special master’s report and the order approving the report. We reverse.

The trial court granted defense counsel’s motion to withdraw and allotted defendants twenty days to obtain new counsel. During that time frame when defendants were unrepresented, the special master conducted a hearing and issued a report on a pending motion concerning defendants’ alleged discovery violations, and the trial court entered an order approving the report. Pursuant to Dunker v. Calkins, 691 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 3d [1124] DCA 1996), and cited cases, the special master and the trial court should have deferred action on the pending matter during the twenty-day interval. Accordingly, the order denying defendants’ motion to vacate must be reversed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affordable Contracting, Inc. v. Santarsiere, 693 So. 2d 1123, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5597, 1997 WL 269171 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 1123 (Affordable Contracting, Inc. v. Santarsiere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JOHNNY SAFFAR v. SHIRAN ATIAS
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023