Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. Colonial Theatre, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. Colonial Theatre, Inc.

165 Misc. 948, 1 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1058

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 1937·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Steinbrink, J.

The defendant, a foreign corporation, appears specially to vacate service of a summons and complaint on the ground that it was not at the time of such service subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State. The defendant is a New Jersey corporation, having its principal place of business in Orange, N. J. It has no office in the State of New York; it has no officer or agent resident in the State of New York. Its business is the exhibition of motion picture films in the State of New Jersey. Periodically the defendant’s president comes into the State of New York to purchase films and to make contracts for their purchase. It was upon one of such visits that the service was made. “ Visits on such business, even if occurring at regular intervals, would not warrant the inference that the corporation was present within the jurisdiction of the State.” (Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U. S. 516, 518; 43 S. Ct. 170, 171; 67 L. Ed. 372. See, also, Hoffman, Inc., v. Mode Shoppe, Inc., 138 Misc. 742.)

The motion is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinbrink, J.

The defendant, a foreign corporation, appears specially to vacate service of a summons and complaint on the ground that it was not at the time of such service subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State. The defendant is a New Jersey corporation, having its principal place of business in Orange, N. J. It has no office in the State of New York; it has no officer or agent resident in the State of New York. Its business is the exhibition of motion picture films in the State of New Jersey. Periodically the defendant’s president comes into the State of New York to purchase films and to make contracts for their purchase. It was upon one of such visits that the service was made. “ Visits on such business, even if occurring at regular intervals, would not warrant the inference that the corporation was present within the jurisdiction of the State.” (Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U. S. 516, 518; 43 S. Ct. 170, 171; 67 L. Ed. 372. See, also, Hoffman, Inc., v. Mode Shoppe, Inc., 138 Misc. 742.)

The motion is granted.

Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. Colonial Theatre, Inc., 165 Misc. 948, 1 N.Y.S.2d 181, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1058 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

Pincite

165 Misc. 948 (Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. Colonial Theatre, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related