Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Kobold
135 S. Ct. 2886, 192 L. Ed. 2d 918, 83 U.S.L.W. 3927, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4428
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 29, 2015·No. No. 13–1467.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, for further consideration in light of new regulations promulgated by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). See OPM, Final Rule, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Subrogation and Reimbursement Recovery,80 Fed.Reg. 29,203 (May 21, 2015)(5 C.F.R. 890.106).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Kobold, 135 S. Ct. 2886, 192 L. Ed. 2d 918, 83 U.S.L.W. 3927, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4428 (U.S. 2015).
135 S. Ct. 2886 (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Kobold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kobold v. Aetna Life Insurance
370 P.3d 128 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2016)