Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Braccidiferro
648 A.2d 161, 231 Conn. 919, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 349
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 833 (AC 11058), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, applied to the defendant’s claim because that claim was not a ‘final judgment’ within the meaning of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77?
“2. If the answer to question 1. is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the application of Public Acts 1993, No. 93-77, to the facts of [920]*920this case did not violate the plaintiff’s rights under: (a) article first, § 1, of the Connecticut constitution; (b) article first, § 10, of the United States constitution; (c) the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution; or (d) article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Braccidiferro, 648 A.2d 161, 231 Conn. 919, 1994 Conn. LEXIS 349 (Colo. 1994).
648 A.2d 161 (Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Braccidiferro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Braccidiferro
643 A.2d 1305 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)