Aetna Iron & Steel Co. v. Taylor

Ohio Circuit Courts

Aetna Iron & Steel Co. v. Taylor

13 Ohio C.C. 602

DecidedJune 15, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Ohio C.C. 602 (Aetna Iron & Steel Co. v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aetna Iron & Steel Co. v. Taylor, 13 Ohio C.C. 602 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Shearer, J.

Judgment affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Pugh, Judge, (3 Nisi Prius Rep. 152), and the further reason that, in the opinion of this court, the Hard law requires the charge under it to be based upon the proportion cf the authorized capital stock represented by property owned and used in Ohio. All the property of this company being within Ohio, and its authorized capital stock being $5,000,000, the secretary of state was right in fixing the fee at $5,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shearer, J.

Judgment affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Pugh, Judge, (3 Nisi Prius Rep. 152), and the further reason that, in the opinion of this court, the Hard law requires the charge under it to be based upon the proportion cf the authorized capital stock represented by property owned and used in Ohio. All the property of this company being within Ohio, and its authorized capital stock being $5,000,000, the secretary of state was right in fixing the fee at $5,000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Ohio C.C. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-iron-steel-co-v-taylor-ohiocirct-1896.