Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co.

11 Cal. App. 26
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Cal. App. 165
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 12, 1909·No. Civ. No. 578·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage and is, therefore, a suit in equity. The appeal was properly taken to the supreme court, but was erroneously filed in this court, such error doubtless occurring through the fact that the entitlement of the court on the back of the transcript and briefs is printed as follows: “In the District Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District.”

[27] It ought to be pretty well understood by the profession by this time that, under section 4 of article VI of the constitution, this court is without appellate jurisdiction of suits in equity by direct appeal.

The case will have to be transferred to the supreme court, and such is the order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co., 11 Cal. App. 26 (Cal. Ct. App. 1909).

11 Cal. App. 26 (Aetna Indemnity Co. v. Altadena Mining & Investment Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.