Aetna Health Management, LLC v. Do Won Oriental Medicine & Acupuncture Clinic, Inc. d/b/a Do Won East Asian Medicine Clinic; Ji W. Kim
This text of Aetna Health Management, LLC v. Do Won Oriental Medicine & Acupuncture Clinic, Inc. d/b/a Do Won East Asian Medicine Clinic; Ji W. Kim (Aetna Health Management, LLC v. Do Won Oriental Medicine & Acupuncture Clinic, Inc. d/b/a Do Won East Asian Medicine Clinic; Ji W. Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2
3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 6 AT SEATTLE 7 AETNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT, LLC, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. C25-2163 TSZ 10 DO WON ORIENTAL MEDICINE & MINUTE ORDER 11 ACUPUNCTURE CLINIC, INC. d/b/a DO WON EAST ASIAN MEDICINE 12 CLINIC; and Ji W. Kim, 13 Defendants. 14 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable 15 Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge: (1) Plaintiff Aetna Health Management, LLC’s Motion for Alternative Service, 16 docket no. 5, is DEFERRED and RENOTED to December 12, 2025. 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) provides that an individual may be served by “following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general 18 jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made.” In Washington, service of process of a corporation may be accomplished by serving its 19 registered agent. RCW 23.95.450(1); RCW 23B.05.050. Service by mail is permissible in Washington if the plaintiff demonstrates that “(1) they made reasonably diligent efforts 20 to personally serve the defendants; (2) service by publication would be justified under Washington law; and (3) the defendants are as likely to receive actual notice from service 21 by mail as they would from service by publication.” Russell v. WADOT Cap., Inc., 2023 WL 3791823, at *2 (W.D. Wash. June 1, 2023); see RCW 4.28.080(15) (allowing 22 substituted service only after plaintiff has attempted, “with reasonable diligence,” to 1 personally serve the individual or entity). “While reasonable diligence does not require the plaintiff to employ all conceivable means to locate the defendant, it does require the 2 plaintiff to follow up on any information possessed that might reasonably assist in determining the defendant’s whereabouts.” Russell, 2023 WL 3791823, at *2 (quoting 3 Pascua v. Heil, 126 Wn. App. 520, 529, 108 P.3d 1253 (2005)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Washington permits service by publication when a Washington resident “keeps 4 himself or herself concealed” within the state “to avoid the service of a summons.” RCW 4.28.100(2); see Dodo Int’l, Inc. v. Parker, 2021 WL 662344, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 19, 5 2021). 6 Aetna made several unsuccessful attempts to serve either defendant. On November 4, 2025, Aetna unsuccessfully attempted service on Defendant Do Won at its 7 principal office address registered with the Washington Secretary of State. Brown Decl. at ⁋ 5 (docket no. 6). A second attempt was made the following day, “at which time the 8 process server was informed by the current occupants that Do Won no longer operated at this address” and that Defendant Ji W. Kim, DO (“Dr. Kim”) had retired. Id. at ⁋ 8. Do 9 Won has not updated its address with the Washington Secretary of State, and its status is listed as “Delinquent.” Id. at ⁋ 9. Dr. Kim is listed as Do Won’s registered agent and the 10 address provided for Dr. Kim is the same address listed for Do Won. Id. at ⁋ 10. Aetna paid to have a search conducted of Dr. Kim and determined his current personal 11 residence is located at 812 S Marine Way, Federal Way, Washington 98003. Id. at ⁋ 12. A process server attempted service at this address three times (November 10, 13, and 14, 12 2025), but nobody was at the home. Id. at ⁋ 13. On this record, the Court cannot find that Defendants are evading service. Aetna 13 has provided the Court with argument that Don Won and Dr. Kim are aware of this lawsuit and evading service, but not evidence. Aetna argues that “[i]mmediately prior to 14 filing suit, Aetna’s undersigned counsel submitted a final demand to Defendants’ counsel,” but “Defendants’ counsel indicated that he was unable to make contact with his 15 clients.” Mot. for Alt. Service at 2 (docket no. 5). This statement is not supported by the declaration, docket no. 6, or its attached exhibits that Aetna filed in support of its motion. 16 Absent such evidence, the Court cannot conclude that Defendants are evading service or that Defendants were aware that this lawsuit was going to be filed against them. It is also 17 questionable whether Aetna exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to locate and serve Defendants without further evidence of Defendants’ alleged service evasion. 18 Aetna’s process server visited Dr. Kim’s residence three times in five days but “no one ever answered the door, nor did anyone seem to be home at any time.” Decl. of 19 Attempted Service, Ex. B. to Brown Decl. (docket no. 6-2 at 2 & 4). This evidence alone does not support a finding that Defendants are attempting to evade service, but merely 20 that nobody was present to accept service of process. See Dodo Int’l, 2021 WL 662344 at *2 (granting motion for leave to serve a defendant by mail and concluding that the 21 process server’s affidavit showed that plaintiffs made diligent efforts to serve the defendant who was attempting to evade service of process where (1) a process server 22 1 attempted to personally serve the defendant six times at his last known address; and (2) the process server declared during some of the service attempts that vehicles registered to 2 the defendant were present and somebody was inside the residence, but nobody answered the door). 3 (2) Plaintiff Aetna is DIRECTED to file on or before December 12, 2025, a 4 supplemental declaration with information concerning its communication with defense counsel being unable to make contact with Defendants and whether the final demand 5 contained any representation that Aetna would be filing a lawsuit, or an explanation for why such information cannot be supplemented. See Mot. for Alt. Service at 2 (docket 6 no. 5). (3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Minute Order to all counsel of 7 record. 8 Dated this 8th day of December, 2025. 9 Ravi Subramanian 10 Clerk 11 s/Grant Cogswell Deputy Clerk 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aetna Health Management, LLC v. Do Won Oriental Medicine & Acupuncture Clinic, Inc. d/b/a Do Won East Asian Medicine Clinic; Ji W. Kim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-health-management-llc-v-do-won-oriental-medicine-acupuncture-wawd-2025.