Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc.

12 Mass. App. Ct. 985

CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court

DecidedDecember 8, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Mass. App. Ct. 985 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State Park Insurance Agency, Inc., 12 Mass. App. Ct. 985 (Mass. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Because count four of the plaintiff’s complaint was brought pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G. L. c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Because count four of the plaintiff’s complaint was brought pursuant to G. L. c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G. L. c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Mass. App. Ct. 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-state-park-insurance-agency-inc-massappct-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack