Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada
This text of 212 So. 2d 628 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On a prima facie of showing of “conflict jurisdiction” we granted certiorari and have heard oral argument.
The decision under review is Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Shihada, 196 So.2d 14 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1967). Allegedly it conflicts with Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Lingle, 133 So.2d 78 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1961).
On further examination of the record and briefs we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict of decisions. The writ is therefore discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 So. 2d 628, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-shihada-fla-1968.