Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Placek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Placek

218 A.D.2d 721, 630 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8831

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 218 A.D.2d 721 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Placek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Placek, 218 A.D.2d 721, 630 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to enforce a contractual right to a trial de novo, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated October 25, 1993, which denied her motion, inter alia, to confirm an arbitrator’s award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, injured in an automobile accident in December 1989, moved, inter alia, to confirm a $30,000 arbitration award in her favor on the ground that a supplementary uninsured motorist provision contained in the insured’s insurance policy was unconscionable and against public policy. The provision provided for the arbitration of uninsured motorist coverage claims but stated that if an arbitration award exceeded the $10,000 limit set forth in Insurance Law § 3420 (f) (2), either party, the insured or the insurer, had the right to seek a trial de novo. The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v Jacobs, 208 AD2d 578; Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co. v Lannon, 216 AD2d 954). Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to enforce a contractual right to a trial de novo, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), dated October 25, 1993, which denied her motion, inter alia, to confirm an arbitrator’s award.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant, injured in an automobile accident in December 1989, moved, inter alia, to confirm a $30,000 arbitration award in her favor on the ground that a supplementary uninsured motorist provision contained in the insured’s insurance policy was unconscionable and against public policy. The provision provided for the arbitration of uninsured motorist coverage claims but stated that if an arbitration award exceeded the $10,000 limit set forth in Insurance Law § 3420 (f) (2), either party, the insured or the insurer, had the right to seek a trial de novo. The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion (see, Allstate Ins. Co. v Jacobs, 208 AD2d 578; Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co. v Lannon, 216 AD2d 954). Miller, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 721, 630 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-placek-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack