Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Newton

500 P.2d 900, 18 Ariz. App. 115, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 794
Court of Appeals of Arizona·Decided September 14, 1972·No. No. 2 CA-CIV 1142·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HOWARD, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment on stipulated facts in favor of the appellee and against the appellant insurance company. There is but one question dispositive of [116]*116this appeal: Is an insurance company precluded from denying liability for a judgment rendered against a former insured when the policy of insurance has been terminated prior to the accident because of a nonpayment of premium, but the insurance company does not return the SR-1A form to the Motor Vehicle Division of the Arizona Highway Department? This issue has recently been decided in the case of Nicholas v. Carolina Casualty Co., 17 Ariz. App. 252, 497 P.2d 72 (1972) 1 wherein the court held that the failure to file an SR-1A form does not preclude an insurer from ■denying liability.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial ■court awarding judgment in favor of the appellee and against the appellant is reversed.

KRUCKER, C. J., and HATHAWAY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Newton, 500 P.2d 900, 18 Ariz. App. 115, 1972 Ariz. App. LEXIS 794 (Ark. Ct. App. 1972).

500 P.2d 900 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Newton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powell v. National Union Fire Insurance
503 P.2d 825 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)