Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Construction Co.

121 So. 883, 97 Fla. 243

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 20, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the order appealed from herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the order appealed from herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., Buford, J., and Giblin, Circuit Judge, concur.

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Construction Co., 121 So. 883, 97 Fla. 243 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 883 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. National Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.