AEtna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Horticultural Service, Inc.
2 A.D.2d 963, 158 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6229, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3596
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1956·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Judgments unanimously reversed, with costs, and judgments are directed to be entered in favor of the plaintiff on the authority of United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Triborough Bridge Auth. (297 N. Y. 31), except for the sum of $331.30 to which defendant United States of America is entitled by virtue of the filing of its assessment in that amount prior to the posting of the February 6, 1950 bond. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Cox, JJ. [1 Misc 2d 956.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
AEtna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Horticultural Service, Inc., 2 A.D.2d 963, 158 N.Y.S.2d 750, 2 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6229, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).
2 A.D.2d 963 (AEtna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Horticultural Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
General Insurace Co. of America v. Ted Price Construction Co.
175 F. Supp. 261 (D. Idaho, 1959)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. New York City Housing Authority
157 F. Supp. 87 (S.D. New York, 1957)
In re Fago Construction Corp.
162 F. Supp. 238 (W.D. New York, 1957)
Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland v. New York City Housing Authority
241 F.2d 142 (Second Circuit, 1957)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. New York City Housing Authority
241 F.2d 142 (Second Circuit, 1957)