Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert

706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2314
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 417 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert, 706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The same legal issue was raised in another certiorari proceeding, where this court held that in an action alleging a motor vehicle dealer’s violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, attorney’s fees could not be recovered from a surety bond which does not provide for such fees. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore granted and the circuit court appellate decision is quashed. See Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hubbel, 704 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

QUASHED.

W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubbel v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
758 So. 2d 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-herbert-fladistctapp-1998.