Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert
This text of 706 So. 2d 417 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The same legal issue was raised in another certiorari proceeding, where this court held that in an action alleging a motor vehicle dealer’s violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, attorney’s fees could not be recovered from a surety bond which does not provide for such fees. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore granted and the circuit court appellate decision is quashed. See Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hubbel, 704 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
QUASHED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-herbert-fladistctapp-1998.