Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert

706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 1998·No. No. 97-2314·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The same legal issue was raised in another certiorari proceeding, where this court held that in an action alleging a motor vehicle dealer’s violation of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, attorney’s fees could not be recovered from a surety bond which does not provide for such fees. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore granted and the circuit court appellate decision is quashed. See Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hubbel, 704 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

QUASHED.

W. SHARP and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert, 706 So. 2d 417, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2479, 1998 WL 106981 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 417 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Herbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hubbel v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
758 So. 2d 94 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)