Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gronholz
261 A.D. 961, 27 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8341
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 3, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
-Action to recover damages for personal injuries arising from the collision of two automobiles. Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered by direction of the trial court, after a trial without a jury. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The diagram placed upon plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 by the witness Greve furnished substantive proof of his negligence and is a bar to plaintiff’s recovery. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gronholz, 261 A.D. 961, 27 N.Y.S.2d 471, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
261 A.D. 961 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gronholz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Refined Syrups & Sugars, Inc.
184 Misc. 941 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)
Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.
268 A.D. 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)
Passzehl v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.
262 A.D. 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)