Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gabari Enterprises, Inc.

186 A.D.2d 607

This text of 186 A.D.2d 607 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gabari Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Gabari Enterprises, Inc., 186 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiff Modern Diagnostic Labs, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Irving S. Aronin, J.), dated [608]*608October 29, 1990, which denied a motion for an examination before trial of an additional representative of the defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to establish that the witness already produced by the defendant for an examination before trial possessed insufficient knowledge of the facts or was otherwise inadequate (see, Tower v Chemical Bank, 140 AD2d 514; Garden State Brickface Co. v Stecker, 130 AD2d 707). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garden State Brickface Co. v. Stecker
130 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Tower v. Chemical Bank
140 A.D.2d 514 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 A.D.2d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-gabari-enterprises-inc-nyappdiv-1992.