Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Daugereaux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Daugereaux

122 So. 2d 674

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 20, 1960

DocketNo. 5065

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 So. 2d 674 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Daugereaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Daugereaux, 122 So. 2d 674 (La. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

TATE, Judge.

For the reasons more fully stated in the companion suit, Dufore v. Daugereaux, La.App., 122 So.2d 666, the trial court judgment dismissing this plaintiff’s suit is reversed, and judgment is rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the amount of $775 (stipulated to be the amount that the plaintiff collision insurer paid to its insured for damages sus[675]*675tained by the latter’s vehicle in the accident), together with legal interest thereupon from date of judicial demand until paid, and for all costs of these proceedings.

Although the amount in dispute is not great, both counsel have shown exceptional diligence, energy, and skill in fully presenting all facets of the legal questions involved in this controversy, and we wish to commend them for their extremely conscientious efforts on behalf of their clients and of the jurisprudence to assist this court in interpreting the statutes in question.

Reversed and rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TATE, Judge.

For the reasons more fully stated in the companion suit, Dufore v. Daugereaux, La.App., 122 So.2d 666, the trial court judgment dismissing this plaintiff’s suit is reversed, and judgment is rendered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants in the amount of $775 (stipulated to be the amount that the plaintiff collision insurer paid to its insured for damages sus[675]*675tained by the latter’s vehicle in the accident), together with legal interest thereupon from date of judicial demand until paid, and for all costs of these proceedings.

Although the amount in dispute is not great, both counsel have shown exceptional diligence, energy, and skill in fully presenting all facets of the legal questions involved in this controversy, and we wish to commend them for their extremely conscientious efforts on behalf of their clients and of the jurisprudence to assist this court in interpreting the statutes in question.

Reversed and rendered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 So. 2d 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-daugereaux-lactapp-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack