Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz

272 So. 2d 834
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1973
DocketNo. 70-547
StatusPublished

This text of 272 So. 2d 834 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz, 272 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on March 2, 1971 (246 So.2d 114) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed September 20, 1972 (271 So.2d 108) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on April 21, 1971 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court in this cause filed March 2, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court appealed from is reversed and the initial judgment of the trial court dated March 26, 1970 is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz
246 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz
271 So. 2d 108 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 So. 2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-v-bortz-fladistctapp-1973.