Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz

272 So. 2d 834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz. Read the opinion of the Court — 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6760
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1973·No. No. 70-547·Published

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on March 2, 1971 (246 So.2d 114) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed September 20, 1972 (271 So.2d 108) and mandate now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with directions;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on April 21, 1971 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court in this cause filed March 2, 1971 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the judgment of the trial court appealed from is reversed and the initial judgment of the trial court dated March 26, 1970 is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz, 272 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

272 So. 2d 834 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz
246 So. 2d 114 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Bortz
271 So. 2d 108 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)