Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham
206 So. 2d 211
This text of 206 So. 2d 211 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Gresham, 206 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1968).
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
206 So. 2d 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-of-hartford-v-gresham-fla-1968.