Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Bass

206 So. 2d 212
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1968
DocketNo. 36615
StatusPublished

This text of 206 So. 2d 212 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford v. Bass, 206 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur. CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
206 So. 2d 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-of-hartford-v-bass-fla-1968.