Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Francis Shapiro) v. Kim

205 A.D.2d 360, 614 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241

This text of 205 A.D.2d 360 (Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Francis Shapiro) v. Kim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (Francis Shapiro) v. Kim, 205 A.D.2d 360, 614 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about December 21, 1993, which denied petitioner insurer’s application to vacate a no-fault arbitration award in favor of respondent claimant and confirmed the award, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances, the arbitrator’s decision denying the adjournment sought cannot be said to rise to the level of misconduct, and is therefore, not reviewable (CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [i]). Concur—Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 A.D.2d 360, 614 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-casualty-surety-co-francis-shapiro-v-kim-nyappdiv-1994.