Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 420
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 2001
Docket00-1984
StatusPublished

This text of 742 N.E.2d 145 (Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 420 (Ohio 2001).

Opinion

Summit App. No. 19121. On discretionary appeal, motion for admission pro hac vice of Michael W. Morrison and Dale R. Kurth by Brian T. Winchester for Allstate Ins. Co., motion for admission pro hac vice by Jordan Bems for A. Hugh Scott and Kathleen A. Burdette for Aetna and Travelers, motion for admission pro hac vice by Gregory J. DeGulis of International Surplus Lines Ins. Co. for Clay Phillips and Dennis Dolan, and motion for admission pro hac vice by Lawrence R. Bach for Michael J. Balch. Appeal allowed and motions granted.

[1448]*1448Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow only on Propositions of Law Nos. I and III. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
742 N.E.2d 145, 91 Ohio St. 3d 1447, 2001 Ohio LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aetna-cas-sur-co-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-co-ohio-2001.