Aes Management Inc v. Keckes Silver & Gadd Pc
This text of Aes Management Inc v. Keckes Silver & Gadd Pc (Aes Management Inc v. Keckes Silver & Gadd Pc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
161137 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh AES MANAGEMENT, INC., Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
v SC: 161137 COA: 346160 Macomb CC: 2018-001589-NM KECKES SILVER & GADD, PC, and LAWRENCE S. GADD, Defendants-Appellants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 2, 2021 t0222 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aes Management Inc v. Keckes Silver & Gadd Pc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aes-management-inc-v-keckes-silver-gadd-pc-mich-2021.