Aery v. Lewis

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided July 20, 2022·No. 0:22-cv-00012·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

James Paul Aery, Civ. No. 22-12 (KMM/BRT)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

Deputy Nick Lewis; Deputy Kyle Beckwith; and Unknown Deputies, Individual and Official Capacity,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff James Paul Aery’s motion for an emergency injunction filed on July 18, 2022.1 (Doc. No. 31.) Plaintiff asks the Court to “arrange for sufficient resources” to cover the costs of his litigation, including phone calls and envelopes. (Id.) While the Court has granted Plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), “nothing in the IFP statute requires the Court to pay a party’s discovery costs.” Janetta v. Minnesota Dep’t of Hum. Servs., No. 19-CV-2622 (ECT/TNL), 2020 WL 4593816, at *1 (D. Minn. Aug. 11, 2020); see also Lightfeather v. Osborn, No. 4:20CV3118, 2021 WL 107141, at *3 (D. Neb. Jan. 12, 2021) (“[T]he statutory right to proceed in forma pauperis does not include the right to receive funds from the court to

1 The Court notes that Plaintiff has filed this exact motion in several other of his cases pending in this district. See Aery v. Arhart, No. 21-CV-2375 (KMM/BRT) (D. Minn. July 18, 2022) (Doc. No. 39); Aery v. Unknown Actors in the Employ of Beltrami County Jail, No. 21-CV-2422 (PJS/JFD) (D. Minn. July 18, 2022) (Doc. No. 33); Aery v. Beitel, No. 22-CV-114 (KMM/TNL) (D. Minn. July 18, 2022) (Doc. No. 16); Aery v. Nohre, No. 22-CV-491 (PJS/TNL) (D. Minn. July 18, 2022) (Doc. No. 30). pay discovery or other costs relating to a pro se litigant’s case.”); Haymes v. Smith, 73 F.R.D. 572, 574 (W.D.N.Y. 1976) (“The generally recognized rule is that a court may not authorize the commitment of federal funds to underwrite the necessary expenditures of an

indigent civil litigant’s action.”) (citing Tyler v. Lark, 472 F.2d 1077 (8th Cir. 1973)). Accordingly, Plaintiff’s injunctive request that the Court finance the costs of his litigation is DENIED. SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 20, 2022 s/ Becky R. Thorson BECKY R. THORSON United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aery v. Lewis, (mnd 2022).

Aery v. Lewis (Aery v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haymes v. Smith
73 F.R.D. 572 (W.D. New York, 1976)