Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 433 F. App'x 903 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 14, 2010·No. 2010-1515·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit AEROTEL, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. TELCO GROUP, INC., STI PHONECAR]j, INC., STI PREPAID DISTRIBUTORS, INC., AND SAMER TAWFIK, Defen,dcmts-Appellees, and g RADIANT TELECOM, INC., » INTELLIGENT SWITCHING & SOFTWARE, LLC, AND NTERA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendcm,ts-Appellees, and 9278 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 9278 DISTRIBUTORS, INC., SAJID KAPADIA, AND NTSE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants. 2010-1515

AEROTEL LTD V. TELCO GROUP 2 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Southern District of NeW Y0rk in case no. 04-CV-10292, Judge Richard J. HolWell. ON MOTION ORDER The appellees move for a 7 -day extension of ti1ne, un- til December 22, 2010, to file their briefs, and until Janu- ary 12, 2011, for the appellant to file its reply brief. Upon consideration thereof lT ls 0RDERE;o THAT: The motion is granted FoR THE CoURT DEC 1 4 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Dennis M. Flaherty, Esq. R0bert T. Mald0nado, Esq. John C. Carey, Esq. H..EB ‘ us courrl: APPsALsr=oR 321 ms FEo§)ci»\Lc:ncun DEC 14 2010 .IAN HJRBALV CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit AEROTEL, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. TELCO GROUP, INC., STI PHONECAR]j, INC., STI PREPAID DISTRIBUTORS, INC., AND SAMER TAWFIK, Defen,dcmts-Appellees, and g RADIANT TELECOM, INC., » INTELLIGENT SWITCHING & SOFTWARE, LLC, AND NTERA HOLDINGS, INC., Defendcm,ts-Appellees, and 9278 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 9278 DISTRIBUTORS, INC., SAJID KAPADIA, AND NTSE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants. 2010-1515

AEROTEL LTD V. TELCO GROUP 2 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Southern District of NeW Y0rk in case no. 04-CV-10292, Judge Richard J. HolWell. ON MOTION ORDER The appellees move for a 7 -day extension of ti1ne, un- til December 22, 2010, to file their briefs, and until Janu- ary 12, 2011, for the appellant to file its reply brief. Upon consideration thereof lT ls 0RDERE;o THAT: The motion is granted FoR THE CoURT DEC 1 4 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Dennis M. Flaherty, Esq. R0bert T. Mald0nado, Esq. John C. Carey, Esq. H..EB ‘ us courrl: APPsALsr=oR 321 ms FEo§)ci»\Lc:ncun DEC 14 2010 .IAN HJRBALV CLERK

Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc. (Aerotel, Ltd. v. Telco Group, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.