Aerodex, Inc. v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Florida

Aerodex, Inc. v. Buckner

207 So. 2d 6

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 14, 1968

DocketNo. 36705

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 6 (Aerodex, Inc. v. Buckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aerodex, Inc. v. Buckner, 207 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date July 21, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 2d 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aerodex-inc-v-buckner-fla-1968.