Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC

S.D. New York

Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC

DecidedJanuary 21, 2022

Docket1:21-cv-09499

StatusUnknown

This text of Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC (Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/21/2 022 -------------------------------------------------------------- X AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC, : Plaintiff, : : -against- : : 21-cv-9499 (VEC) : HUGGOES FASHION LLC (DBA : ORDER AEROTHOTIC) AND MAHMOOD ALI, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on January 20, 2022, Defendants filed three separate motions to dismiss, each with its own supporting memorandum of law, see Dkts. 28–33; WHEREAS Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(g)(2) provides that “a party that makes a motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule raising a defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its earlier motion,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(g)(2); WHEREAS courts in this District have made clear that “Rule 12(g)(2) requires a party to consolidate all of its available Rule 12 defenses into a single motion,” see, e.g., Alzheimer’s Found. of Am., Inc. v. Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Assoc., 2018 WL 2084168, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2018); see also Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1385 (3d ed.2004) (“Rule 12(g) . . . contemplates a single pre-answer motion in which the defendant asserts all the Rule 12 defenses and objections that are then available to him or her.”); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike Defendants’ motions to dismiss and accompanying memoranda of law at docket entries 28 through 33. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants must, no later than January 24, 2022, refile their motions to dismiss as a single consolidated motion that complies with Rule 4 of the Undersigned’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases.

SO ORDERED. , *

Date: January 21, 2022 VALERIE caFR Nn New York, New York United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/21/2 022 -------------------------------------------------------------- X AERO AG HOLDINGS, LLC, : Plaintiff, : : -against- : : 21-cv-9499 (VEC) : HUGGOES FASHION LLC (DBA : ORDER AEROTHOTIC) AND MAHMOOD ALI, : : Defendants. : -------------------------------------------------------------- X VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: WHEREAS on January 20, 2022, Defendants filed three separate motions to dismiss, each with its own supporting memorandum of law, see Dkts. 28–33; WHEREAS Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(g)(2) provides that “a party that makes a motion under this rule must not make another motion under this rule raising a defense or objection that was available to the party but omitted from its earlier motion,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(g)(2); WHEREAS courts in this District have made clear that “Rule 12(g)(2) requires a party to consolidate all of its available Rule 12 defenses into a single motion,” see, e.g., Alzheimer’s Found. of Am., Inc. v. Alzheimer’s Disease & Related Disorders Assoc., 2018 WL 2084168, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2018); see also Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1385 (3d ed.2004) (“Rule 12(g) . . . contemplates a single pre-answer motion in which the defendant asserts all the Rule 12 defenses and objections that are then available to him or her.”); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike Defendants’ motions to dismiss and accompanying memoranda of law at docket entries 28 through 33. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants must, no later than January 24, 2022, refile their motions to dismiss as a single consolidated motion that complies with Rule 4 of the Undersigned’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases.

SO ORDERED. , *

Date: January 21, 2022 VALERIE caFR Nn New York, New York United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Aero AG Holdings, LLC v. Huggoes Fashion LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aero-ag-holdings-llc-v-huggoes-fashion-llc-nysd-2022.