Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum

226 A.D. 743

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1929·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order granting injunction pendente lite modified by requiring that, pursuant to'sections 819 and 893 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff furnish an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the sum of $1,000, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the case to be placed at the head of the calendar of the Kings County Special Term, Part III, for Monday, April 15, 1929. The injunction should not have been granted without an undertaking. (Howley v. Francis Press, 127 App. Div. 646.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting injunction pendente lite modified by requiring that, pursuant to'sections 819 and 893 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff furnish an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the sum of $1,000, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the case to be placed at the head of the calendar of the Kings County Special Term, Part III, for Monday, April 15, 1929. The injunction should not have been granted without an undertaking. (Howley v. Francis Press, 127 App. Div. 646.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum, 226 A.D. 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

226 A.D. 743 (Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related