Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum
This text of 226 A.D. 743 (Aerial Upholstering Co. v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting injunction pendente lite modified by requiring that, pursuant to'sections 819 and 893 of the Civil Practice Act, plaintiff furnish an undertaking, with corporate surety, in the sum of $1,000, and as so modified affirmed, without costs; the case to be placed at the head of the calendar of the Kings County Special Term, Part III, for Monday, April 15, 1929. The injunction should not have been granted without an undertaking. (Howley v. Francis Press, 127 App. Div. 646.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 A.D. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aerial-upholstering-co-v-blum-nyappdiv-1929.