Aerial Products, Inc. v. Anzalone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aerial Products, Inc. v. Anzalone

5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 997 (Aerial Products, Inc. v. Anzalone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aerial Products, Inc. v. Anzalone, 5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from (1) a judgment of the County Court, [994]*994Queens County, convicting appellant, after trial, of feloniously selling a narcotic drug (Penal Law, § 1751) and sentencing Mm, as a second felony offender, to serve from 20 to 25 years, (2) said sentence, (3) the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the evidence and the law, and (4) the denial of his motion to inspect the Grand Jury minutes and to dismiss the indictment. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence and the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Present — Nolan,- P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from (1) a judgment of the County Court, [994]*994Queens County, convicting appellant, after trial, of feloniously selling a narcotic drug (Penal Law, § 1751) and sentencing Mm, as a second felony offender, to serve from 20 to 25 years, (2) said sentence, (3) the denial of his motion to set aside the verdict as being contrary to the evidence and the law, and (4) the denial of his motion to inspect the Grand Jury minutes and to dismiss the indictment. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. No separate appeal lies from the sentence and the intermediate orders, which have been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction.

Present — Nolan,- P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 997, 173 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aerial-products-inc-v-anzalone-nyappdiv-1958.