Aenergy, S.A. v. Republic of Angola

• Court: District Court, S.D. New York
• Decided: May 7, 2020
• Docket: 1:20-cv-03569
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

ee 7 svi} UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT QO 3 5 o sf SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK re Par. wots ARG Lu ee ee X AENERGY, S.A. and COMBINED CYCLE : POWER PLANT SOYO, $.A., UIGE MATHAal Plaintiffs, y, : REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA; MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND WATER OF THE REPUBLIC OF CIVIL ACTION NO. __ ANGOLA; MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE : REPUBLIC OF ANGOLA; EMPRESA PUBLICA | [PROPOSED] ORDER , : GRANTING PLAINTIFES DE PRODUCAO DE ELECTRICIDADE, EP; and APPLICATION TO FILE EMPRESA NACIONAL DE DISTRIBUICAO DE; ELECTRICIDADE : COMPLAINT AND EXHIBITS , : PROVISIONALLY UNDER : SEAL AND WITH Angola Defendants, REDACTIONS and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GENERAL — : ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL, INC.; and GE : CAPITAL EFS FINANCING, INC., : GE Defendants. : Se eee eee ee ee eee ee X

The Court having reviewed the submission filed by Plaintiffs and having found that good cause exists for Plaintiffs’ application to file certain documents with redactions, it is therefore hereby: ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ complaint and exhibits may be provisionally filed with redactions, with an unredacted version filed under seal and served on all defendants, and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within Lraays of having been served with an unredacted version of the complaint and exhibits, the GE Defendants shall either (1) file a letter stating that they do not wish to seek sealed treatment of the complaint and exhibits, in which

event Plaintiffs may then file the complaint and exhibits publicly, or (2) file a letter-motion explaining why continued sealing is warranted, identifying those parts that they believe warrant qo. ‘ i, atin . Total pr rovwidin’ supporting fact affidavits and other materials necessary to justify such treatment under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir, 2006).

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York May *}, 2020 Vel ; United States District iudge Southern District of New York