A.E.K. v. L.A.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

A.E.K. v. L.A.K.

857 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 757, 1993 WL 172022

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 25, 1993·No. No. 61721·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

L.A.K., the biological mother of P.W.K. (Child), appeals from a final adoption decree granting adoption of Child to Child’s paternal grandparents. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties [434]*434have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

L.A.K., the biological mother of P.W.K. (Child), appeals from a final adoption decree granting adoption of Child to Child’s paternal grandparents. We affirm per Rule 84.16(b). The trial court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties [434]*434have been furnished with a memorandum for their information, only.

A.E.K. v. L.A.K., 857 S.W.2d 433, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 757, 1993 WL 172022 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

857 S.W.2d 433 (A.E.K. v. L.A.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.