Aegiros v. Karen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aegiros v. Karen

60 A.D.2d 520

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 6, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 60 A.D.2d 520 (Aegiros v. Karen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aegiros v. Karen, 60 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 1, 1976, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial directed on the issue of damages only unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict of $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages proven by plaintiff warranted a verdict no greater than the $50,000 to which her recovery should be limited. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered October 1, 1976, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial directed on the issue of damages only unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict of $50,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The damages proven by plaintiff warranted a verdict no greater than the $50,000 to which her recovery should be limited. Concur —Kupferman, J. P., Evans, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aegiros-v-karen-nyappdiv-1977.