Aedes Mosquito Control, Inc. v. SPRINGER EQUIPMENT, INC.

959 So. 2d 1208, 2007 WL 1730145
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 18, 2007
Docket1D06-2806
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 959 So. 2d 1208 (Aedes Mosquito Control, Inc. v. SPRINGER EQUIPMENT, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aedes Mosquito Control, Inc. v. SPRINGER EQUIPMENT, INC., 959 So. 2d 1208, 2007 WL 1730145 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

959 So.2d 1208 (2007)

AEDES MOSQUITO CONTROL, INC., a corporation, Appellant,
v.
SPRINGER EQUIPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, and M.L. "Doc" Springer, a/k/a Marion Springer, Appellees.

No. 1D06-2806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 18, 2007.

Neil L. Weinreb, Jacksonville; Carl D. Dawson of Dawson, Galant & Sulik, Jacksonville; William H. Folsom, Jr., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Tracy L. Wenzel and Jeremy T. Simons of Heekin, Malin & Wenzel, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

*1209 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See McCormick Machinery, Inc. v. Julian E. Johnson and Sons, Inc., 523 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Giallo v. New Piper Aircraft, Inc., 855 So.2d 1273, 1275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (holding that a party cannot recover for fraudulent representations which are disclaimed in a later written agreement).

BROWNING, C.J., and WOLF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rose v. ADT SEC. Services, Inc.
989 So. 2d 1244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
959 So. 2d 1208, 2007 WL 1730145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aedes-mosquito-control-inc-v-springer-equipment-inc-fladistctapp-2007.