Aebischer v. White
692 P.2d 128, 71 Or. App. 308, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4716
This text of 692 P.2d 128 (Aebischer v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Aebischer v. White, 692 P.2d 128, 71 Or. App. 308, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4716 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an “Order Directing Verdict in Favor of Defendant Reidt,”1 the dispositive language of which reads:
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that defendant Reidt’s motion for a directed verdict is allowed and that defendant Reidt have and recover from plaintiff his costs and disbursements incurred herein and taxed at $110.00 and that execution issue therefor.”
As in City of Portland v. Carriage Inn, 296 Or 191, 673 P2d 531 (1983), the order here would lay the foundation for the entry of a judgment, not prevent it. ORS 19.010(2)(a); ORCP 70A.
Dismissed for want of an appealable order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Portland v. Carriage Inn
673 P.2d 531 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
692 P.2d 128, 71 Or. App. 308, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aebischer-v-white-orctapp-1984.