Adzhi-Akopyan's Case

582 N.E.2d 537, 411 Mass. 1003, 1991 Mass. LEXIS 576
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 10, 1991·Published

Opinion

This case is strikingly similar to Borofsky’s Case, ante 379 (1991), also decided today, to the extent that it questions whether the term “average weekly wage,” as used in G. L. c. 152 (1990 ed.), the workers’ compensation law, includes the value of employer-paid medical insurance. Unlike Borofsky’s Case, the employer in this case was obligated to pay the cost of employees’ medical insurance under a collective bargaining agreement. This is the only difference between the cases.

For all the reasons supporting the exclusion of the value of health insurance in Borofsky’s Case, we hold that the value of health insurance should be excluded from the calculation of the average weekly wage in the present case.

The decision of the reviewing board of the Department of Industrial Accidents is affirmed.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adzhi-Akopyan's Case, 582 N.E.2d 537, 411 Mass. 1003, 1991 Mass. LEXIS 576 (Mass. 1991).

582 N.E.2d 537 (Adzhi-Akopyan's Case) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.