Advantage Aviation Technologies, Inc. v. Axcess Aviation Maintenance Services, Inc.
This text of Advantage Aviation Technologies, Inc. v. Axcess Aviation Maintenance Services, Inc. (Advantage Aviation Technologies, Inc. v. Axcess Aviation Maintenance Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vacate; Affirm in part; Render in part and Opinion Filed February 6, 2024
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00344-CV
ADVANTAGE AVIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant V. AXCESS AVIATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-03315
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Smith Opinion by Justice Molberg Before the Court is appellee Axcess Aviation Maintenance Services, Inc.’s
“Motion to Correct Judgment and Render Judgment Against Surety,” which seeks
to correct our December 27, 2023 judgment in accordance with Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 43.5. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5.1
We GRANT the motion to the extent we (1) ORDER the Clerk to file, as of
the date of this opinion, the supplemental clerk’s record appellee submitted to this
1 The rule states, “When a court of appeals affirms the trial court judgment, or modifies that judgment and renders judgment against the appellant, the court of appeals must render judgment against the sureties on the appellant’s supersedeas bond, if any, for the performance of the judgment and for any costs taxed against the appellant.” TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5. court on January 17, 2024; (2) VACATE our December 27, 2023 judgment, and (3)
AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment against appellant Advantage Aviation
Technologies, Inc. and RENDER JUDGMENT against Lexington National
Insurance Company on the claims affirmed against appellant for the performance of
the judgment and for any costs taxed against appellant, subject to the terms and
conditions of the supersedeas bond filed by appellant.
230344f.p05 /Ken Molberg/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
–2– Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ADVANTAGE AVIATION On Appeal from the 14th Judicial TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-03315. No. 05-23-00344-CV V. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Pedersen, III and AXCESS AVIATION Smith participating. MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC., Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s supplemental opinion of this date, we VACATE our December 27, 2023 judgment, AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment against appellant Advantage Aviation Technologies, Inc., and RENDER JUDGMENT against Lexington National Insurance Company on the claims affirmed against appellant for the performance of the judgment and for any costs taxed against appellant, subject to the terms and conditions of the supersedeas bond filed by appellant.
It is ORDERED that appellee AXCESS AVIATION MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC. recover its costs of this appeal from appellant ADVANTAGE AVIATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Judgment entered this 6th day of February, 2024.
–3–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Advantage Aviation Technologies, Inc. v. Axcess Aviation Maintenance Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advantage-aviation-technologies-inc-v-axcess-aviation-maintenance-texapp-2024.