Advanta-Star Automotive Research Corporation of America v. Madsen Holdings, LLC
Opinion
OK ok ADVANTA-STAR AUTOMOTIVE Case No. 2:21-cv-00026-RFB-BNW AMERICA, Plaintiff, ORDER V. MADSEN HOLDINGS, LLC D/B/A MADSEN MARKETING & PR; TIGER MOTORS LV, INC. D/B/A INFINITI OF LAS VEGAS; AND INFINITI AND BEYOND, LLC D/B/A INFINITY OF KENTUCKY; and BRITTANY MADSEN, an individual, Defendants. Before the court is Defendants’ motion to seal certain documents accompanying its motion to compel discovery. ECF No. 48. Since that motion was filed, the parties have settled the case. ECF Nos. 57-58. As a result, the court did not have to decide Defendants’ motion to compel. Given this, the public access considerations under Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu are not implicated. 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to seal ECF No. 49 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to keep ECF No. 49 and its attachments under seal. DATED: July 5, 2022 Zs Ste Ls Are □□□ NDA WEKSLER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Advanta-Star Automotive Research Corporation of America v. Madsen Holdings, LLC (Advanta-Star Automotive Research Corporation of America v. Madsen Holdings, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.