Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo

Seventh Circuit

Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedMay 12, 2014

Docket13-3005

StatusPublished

This text of Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo (Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo, (7th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER May 12, 2014 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, doing business as PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff - Appellee No.: 13-3005 v.

REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants - Appellants

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-00296-JVB-RBC Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division District Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT ERRORS IN MAY 9, 2014 OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT, filed on May 12, 2014, by counsel for the defendants,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the word "judgment" is replaced with "preliminary injunction" in the final sentence of the court's opinion and the first sentence of the court's judgment, both dated May 9, 2014. The final sentence in this court's opinion is AMENDED to read: "We REMAND the case with instructions to vacate the preliminary judgment and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction." The first sentence in the court's judgment is AMENDED to read: "The case is REMANDED with instructions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction." form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse Office of the Clerk Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street Phone: (312) 435-5850 Chicago, Illinois 60604 www.ca7.uscourts.gov

ORDER May 12, 2014 Before DIANE P. WOOD, Chief Judge

ADVANCED TACTICAL ORDNANCE SYSTEMS, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, doing business as PEPPERBALL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff - Appellee No.: 13-3005 v.

REAL ACTION PAINTBALL, INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants - Appellants

Originating Case Information:

District Court No: 1:12-cv-00296-JVB-RBC Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division District Judge Joseph S. Van Bokkelen

Upon consideration of the MOTION TO CORRECT ERRORS IN MAY 9, 2014 OPINION AND FINAL JUDGMENT, filed on May 12, 2014, by counsel for the defendants,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and the word "judgment" is replaced with "preliminary injunction" in the final sentence of the court's opinion and the first sentence of the court's judgment, both dated May 9, 2014. The final sentence in this court's opinion is AMENDED to read: "We REMAND the case with instructions to vacate the preliminary judgment and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction." The first sentence in the court's judgment is AMENDED to read: "The case is REMANDED with instructions to vacate the judgment and dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction." form name: c7_Order_3J(form ID: 177)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys v. Real Action Paintball, Incorpo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advanced-tactical-ordnance-sys-v-real-action-paint-ca7-2014.