Advanced Refractory Technologies, Inc. v. Power Authority
This text of 187 A.D.2d 1027 (Advanced Refractory Technologies, Inc. v. Power Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: We disagree with Supreme Court that the Niagara Redevelopment Act (16 USC §§ 836-836a) obligated the Power Authority of the State of New York to sell replacement power at the cost of producing that power and that section 1005 (5) of the Public Authorities Law prohibited the Power Authority from charging rates in excess of the Power Authority’s cost of producing that power. Nowhere in the Niagara Redevelopment Act did Congress mandate that the Power Authority sell replacement power at cost; it referred only to low-cost power (16 USC § 836 [b] [3]; Occidental Chem. Corp. v Power Auth., 786 F Supp 316, 326-327). Public Authorities Law § 1005 (5) creates no rate protection for industrial consumers; it reserves the "lowest possible rates” for domestic and rural consumers. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Article 78.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 A.D.2d 1027, 590 N.Y.S.2d 343, 140 P.U.R.4th 24, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advanced-refractory-technologies-inc-v-power-authority-nyappdiv-1992.