Advanced Radiology v. Barton
This text of 252 A.3d 965 (Advanced Radiology v. Barton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No. 03-C-18-002119 Argued: June 3, 2021
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
OF MARYLAND
No. 56
September Term, 2020
ADVANCED RADIOLOGY P.A., et al.
v.
WILLIAM JAMES BARTON, JR., et al.
Barbera, C.J. McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran
JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic. Filed: June 8, 2021 2021-06-08 09:42-04:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ADVANCED RADIOLOGY P.A., et al. * IN THE
* COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* No. 56
WILLIAM JAMES BARTON, JR., et al. * September Term, 2020
The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case having been granted
and argued, it is this 8th day of June, 2021,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and
it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.
/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.3d 965, 474 Md. 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advanced-radiology-v-barton-md-2021.