Advanced Radiology v. Barton

252 A.3d 965, 474 Md. 122
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided June 8, 2021·No. 56pc/20·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No. 03-C-18-002119 Argued: June 3, 2021

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

No. 56

September Term, 2020

ADVANCED RADIOLOGY P.A., et al.

v.

WILLIAM JAMES BARTON, JR., et al.

Barbera, C.J.

McDonald

Watts

Hotten

Getty

Booth

Biran

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

Filed: June 8, 2021

2021-06-08

09:42-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk

ADVANCED RADIOLOGY P.A., et al. * IN THE * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND * No. 56

WILLIAM JAMES BARTON, JR., et al. * September Term, 2020

PER CURIAM ORDER

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case having been granted and argued, it is this 8th day of June, 2021,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Advanced Radiology v. Barton, 252 A.3d 965, 474 Md. 122 (Md. 2021).

252 A.3d 965 (Advanced Radiology v. Barton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related