Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment
This text of Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment (Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ADVANCED EYECARE OF CENTRAL FLORIDA,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-2295
REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed February 10, 2017
Administrative Appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.
Jason H. Clark, West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Katie E. Sabo, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the
Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision
allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully
considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See,
e.g., Parker v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So. 3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct.
Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal
referee’s findings, . . . this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)).
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Advanced Eyecare v. Reemployment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advanced-eyecare-v-reemployment-fladistctapp-2017.