Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

209 So. 3d 680, 2017 WL 539743, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 10, 2017

DocketCase No. 5D16-2295

StatusPublished

This text of 209 So. 3d 680 (Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, 209 So. 3d 680, 2017 WL 539743, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemploy[681]*681ment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So.3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct. Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, ... this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Advanced Eyecare of Central Florida (“Employer”) appeals from a final order of the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, which affirmed a referee’s decision allowing a terminated employee to receive unemployment benefits. Having carefully considered Employer’s arguments on appeal and the record before us, we affirm. See, e.g., Parker v. Unemploy[681]*681ment Appeals Comm’n, 41 So.3d 1090, 1090 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“An appeal referee’s factual determinations are ordinarily presumed to be correct. Thus, if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the appeal referee’s findings, ... this court must affirm.” (citation omitted)).

AFFIRMED.

COHEN, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 So. 3d 680, 2017 WL 539743, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/advanced-eyecare-of-central-florida-v-reemployment-assistance-appeals-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack