Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC v. DPS PR Realty, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided June 29, 2026·No. 8:25-cv-00653·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

ADVANCED CARE PEDIATRICS OF FLORIDA, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:25-cv-653-KKM-CPT

DPS PR REALTY, INC.,

Defendant.

ORDER The United States Magistrate Judge recommends granting Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC’s unopposed motion for entitlement to attorney’s fees and costs. See R. & R. (Doc. 62); Mot. (Doc. 57).1 The fourteen- day deadline to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation has passed without either party lodging an objection. Considering the record, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation for the reasons stated therein and grants the motion.

1 The plaintiff also filed what is titled “Supplemental Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.” (Doc. 59). It is not a separate motion. Rather, it is the plaintiff’s conferral supplement in accordance with Local Rule 3.01(g)(3). After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify a magistrate

judge’s Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by a magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district court

reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs, 379 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1246 (M.D. Fla. 2019).

In the absence of any objection and after reviewing the factual allegations and legal conclusions, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 62) is ADOPTED and made a part of this Order for all purposes. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees and Costs (Doc. 57) is GRANTED.

3. No later than forty-five days after the entry of this order, Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC, must file a supplemental motion on the amount of requested fees and costs in accordance with Local Rule 7.01(c). ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on June 29, 2026.

imball Mizelle United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC v. DPS PR Realty, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2026).

Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC v. DPS PR Realty, Inc. (Advanced Care Pediatrics of Florida, LLC v. DPS PR Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marina Cooper-Houston v. Southern Railway Company
37 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)
Ashworth v. Glades Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners
379 F. Supp. 3d 1244 (M.D. Florida, 2019)
Stokes v. Singletary
952 F.2d 1567 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)