Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wirth

Ohio Court of Appeals

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wirth

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 739, 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 990

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 21, 1927

DocketNo. 839

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 739 (Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wirth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Wirth, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 739, 1927 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 990 (Ohio Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF COURT

The following is taken verbatim from the opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Under our code of civil procedure, a motion for a new trial is not required to be filed under the circumstances disclosed in this case.

“2. No motion for a new trial is necessary to authorize a reviewing court to review the judgment of the trial court upon a motion to dissolve an attachment, although the weight of evidence is involved.” Stone, Assignee v. Bank, 8 C.C. 636.

_ The same conclusion was announced by a circuit court of another district, the opinion being found in 2 C.C. (N.S.) 554.

We are, therefore, unanimously, of- the opinion that we are not disabled from examining the evidence to see whether the finding of the trial court was properly made.

Judgment entered by the trial court will therefore be reversed, and, there being no evidence to sustain the allegation, the attachment is ordered discharged and the property, levied upon, released.

(Washburn, PJ., Funk, J., and Pardee,' J., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI