ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Van Peterson Fine Jewelers
Opinion
Order entered June 3, 2015
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-00646-CV
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., Appellant
V.
VAN PETERSON FINE JEWELERS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12111
ORDER We DENY the June 2, 2015 unopposed motion of nonresident attorney Charles C. Eblen
for admission pro hac vice without prejudice to filing a motion accompanied by a motion of the
resident practicing Texas attorney with whom he shall be associated, which motion shall contain
a statement that the resident attorney finds the applicant to be a reputable attorney and
recommends that the applicant be granted permission to participate in the particular proceeding
before the Court. See Tex. Rules Govern. Bar Adm’n Rule XIX(b).
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Van Peterson Fine Jewelers (ADT Security Services, Inc. v. Van Peterson Fine Jewelers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.