Adsit v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Adsit v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.

8 A.D. 616, 40 N.Y.S. 1139, 1896 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D. 616 (Adsit v. General Fire Extinguisher Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adsit v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 8 A.D. 616, 40 N.Y.S. 1139, 1896 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This order must be reversed. The notice of claim of preference and that it would be moved for at the opening of the court was duly given. It was served with the notice of trial and was sufficient to satisfy the statute. The special notice was given pursuant to and in consequence of the adoption of Rule 3 of the Trial Term rules of this court. Present—Barrett, Rumsey, Patterson and Ingraham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This order must be reversed. The notice of claim of preference and that it would be moved for at the opening of the court was duly given. It was served with the notice of trial and was sufficient to satisfy the statute. The special notice was given pursuant to and in consequence of the adoption of Rule 3 of the Trial Term rules of this court. Present—Barrett, Rumsey, Patterson and Ingraham, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D. 616, 40 N.Y.S. 1139, 1896 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adsit-v-general-fire-extinguisher-co-nyappdiv-1896.