Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 27, 2005
Docket06-05-00090-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company (Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion



In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana


______________________________


No. 06-05-00090-CV



JOSEPH AND ADRIENNE GALLIEN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND ON

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Appellants

V.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL HOME LOANS, INC., KAUFMAN AND BROAD LONE STAR, L.P., KAUFMAN AND BROAD MORTGAGE COMPANY,

SAN ANTONIO TITLE COMPANY, FLEET MORTGAGE CORP.,

MORTGAGE SOURCE VENTURES CORPORATION, Appellees




On Appeal from the 189th Judicial District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2004-41206





Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss



MEMORANDUM OPINION

            On September 13, 2005, this Court entered an order in this case permanently abating the case on suggestion of bankruptcy. See 11 U.S.C.A. § 362 (2004). More than a month has now passed, and no party has requested reinstatement of the case or filed a motion contesting our order of abatement.

            Accordingly, for administrative purposes, we issue this opinion, which formally abates the case. Henceforth, this case will be treated as closed. Any party may reinstate by promptly filing a motion with an attached certified copy of the order showing that the automatic bankruptcy stay has been lifted or terminated and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. In the event of reinstatement, any period that began to run and had not expired at the time of the original order of abatement will begin anew when the proceeding is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2.

                                                                                    Josh R. Morriss, III

                                                                                    Chief Justice


Date Submitted:          October 26, 2005

Date Decided:             October 27, 2005

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Adrienne Gallien and Joseph Gallien v. Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. Fleet Mortgage Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adrienne-gallien-and-joseph-gallien-v-washington-m-texapp-2005.