Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

440 F.2d 798, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11524
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 5, 1971·No. 25033·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order for deportation is affirmed.

We reject the contentions that this court should wait on some state court proceedings, that the deportation statute is unconstitutional, that petitioner should have had appointed counsel in the administrative proceedings, and that the result is cruel and unusual.

The narcotics offense to which Van Dijk pleaded guilty was rather petty: sale of a marijuana cigaret. But Congress had a right to make the offense a ground to deport an alien.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 440 F.2d 798, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11524 (9th Cir. 1971).

440 F.2d 798 (Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Samoa Government v. Falefatu
17 Am. Samoa 2d 114 (High Court of American Samoa, 1990)