Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
440 F.2d 798, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11524
Opinion
The order for deportation is affirmed.
We reject the contentions that this court should wait on some state court proceedings, that the deportation statute is unconstitutional, that petitioner should have had appointed counsel in the administrative proceedings, and that the result is cruel and unusual.
The narcotics offense to which Van Dijk pleaded guilty was rather petty: sale of a marijuana cigaret. But Congress had a right to make the offense a ground to deport an alien.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 440 F.2d 798, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11524 (9th Cir. 1971).
440 F.2d 798 (Adrianus Jacobus Van Dijk v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jose N. Briseno v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
192 F.3d 1320 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
American Samoa Government v. Falefatu
17 Am. Samoa 2d 114 (High Court of American Samoa, 1990)
Raymond E. Bassett v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
581 F.2d 1385 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
Alfred Yvon Letourneur v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
538 F.2d 1368 (Ninth Circuit, 1976)
Lieggi v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
389 F. Supp. 12 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)