Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste
This text of Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste (Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 23, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2224 Lower Tribunal No. 23-20898-SP-26 ________________
Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez, Appellant,
vs.
Canel Jamiel Auguste, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence D. King, Judge.
Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez, in proper person.
No appearance, for appellees.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Field Club, Inc. v. Alario, 180 So. 3d 1138, 1142 (Fla.
2d DCA 2015) (emphasizing that “the trial court has broad discretion in
awarding costs”); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Lewis, 275 So. 3d 747,
750 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (“[I]t is clear that taxable costs for experts do not
include costs for those experts who do not testify. Therefore, costs for non-
testifying experts are nontaxable.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adriano-cuesta-rodriguez-v-canel-jamiel-auguste-fladistctapp-2025.