Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 2025·No. 3D2024-2224·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 23, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-2224 Lower Tribunal No. 23-20898-SP-26 ________________

Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez, Appellant,

vs.

Canel Jamiel Auguste, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Lawrence D. King, Judge.

Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez, in proper person.

No appearance, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Field Club, Inc. v. Alario, 180 So. 3d 1138, 1142 (Fla.

2d DCA 2015) (emphasizing that “the trial court has broad discretion in

awarding costs”); R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Lewis, 275 So. 3d 747,

750 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) (“[I]t is clear that taxable costs for experts do not

include costs for those experts who do not testify. Therefore, costs for non-

testifying experts are nontaxable.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste (Adriano Cuesta Rodriguez v. Canel Jamiel Auguste) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Field Club, Inc. v. Alario
180 So. 3d 1138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Lewis
275 So. 3d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)