Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.

101 F. 1005, 41 C.C.A. 675, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 5, 1900·No. No. 160·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal must be dismissed, because an order overruling a demurrer and giving the defendant leave to answer. is not a final decision. See (C. C.) 98 Fed. 118.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co., 101 F. 1005, 41 C.C.A. 675, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500 (2d Cir. 1900).

101 F. 1005 (Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.
98 F. 118 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1899)