Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.
101 F. 1005, 41 C.C.A. 675, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500
This text of 101 F. 1005 (Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co., 101 F. 1005, 41 C.C.A. 675, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500 (2d Cir. 1900).
Opinion
This appeal must be dismissed, because an order overruling a demurrer and giving the defendant leave to answer. is not a final decision. See (C. C.) 98 Fed. 118.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Adriance, Platt & Co. v. National Harrow Co.
98 F. 118 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 F. 1005, 41 C.C.A. 675, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adriance-platt-co-v-national-harrow-co-ca2-1900.